I second that motion — the more Assembly activity, the better

Reply

THE PRINCIPALITY OF REMLASIA generally supports this motion but is concerned that SPSF members will be able to post anywhere within the RMB to indicate their voting preference as per the language of Bill A2002.04, making it potentially difficult for other regional members to track evidence of SPSF members exercising their proposed right to distance voting if there is usually a single thread for each election that members of The South Pacific are required to vote through (either by selecting an option via a poll or by replying directly to that thread).

We would have preferred these procedural concerns to have been addressed in the language of Bill A2002.04 before it was sent to vote, but as far as we can tell, there is no mechanism for us to propose amendments now that the Bill is being voted on.

Therefore, the PRINCIPALITY OF REMLASIA will be voting AGAINST this Bill. However, we do support the intent behind it and we will vote in favour of a future Bill for the same if it addresses our concerns.

Crown Prince of the Principality of Remlasia
Under Semi-Constitutional Monarchy

(This post was last modified: 02-17-2020, 07:44 PM by remlasia.)

Reply

But wouldn't there be any real-time consequences Identified if such proposal is Ratified?? May you enlighten me, please.

Legislator

Reply