So, how about that RA split, huh? |
(07-22-2020, 05:40 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(07-22-2020, 03:05 AM)Whole India Wrote: So if such atmosphere prevails then working for MORA is slavery. I am not volunteering, I am doing civil service and it can't be compared to volunteering.
If we want a RA division then I feel there should be one ministry, but deputy ministers shall lead that split [division] and give a monthly report to the Minister
(07-23-2020, 02:01 AM)Whole India Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:40 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(07-22-2020, 03:05 AM)Whole India Wrote: So if such atmosphere prevails then working for MORA is slavery. You are not paid in any mean, you are volunteering, MoRA does not hire or pay anyone, people who like to help just help.
Chief Supervising Armchair
(07-23-2020, 03:04 AM)USoVietnam Wrote:(07-23-2020, 02:01 AM)Whole India Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:40 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(07-22-2020, 03:05 AM)Whole India Wrote: So if such atmosphere prevails then working for MORA is slavery. Yes I know that, but I will not say volunteering is appropriate, I will say its civil service whether paid or not
(07-23-2020, 03:14 AM)Whole India Wrote:(07-23-2020, 03:04 AM)USoVietnam Wrote:(07-23-2020, 02:01 AM)Whole India Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:40 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(07-22-2020, 03:05 AM)Whole India Wrote: So if such atmosphere prevails then working for MORA is slavery. Still, comparing it to slavery is very inappropriate. Please present detailed information on your claim about freedom restriction.
Chief Supervising Armchair
For my part (and as someone who voted against all of the various split proposals when they came before the Assembly earlier this year), I'm still not sure what problem a split is purported to fix. Seems like one of the major concerns in the posts above is inactivity, so what would a split do to encourage greater activity? Are there any examples (maybe from other regions) where a different division of responsibilities has resulted in a more active community?
Inactivity seems (to me, at least) to be less of a problem with the structure of the ministry/ministries and more about the recruitment and retention of those involved. If anything, splitting the ministry into two (or more) entities might make that even more difficult, as well as a duplication of effort.
(07-23-2020, 05:45 AM)Bleakfoot Wrote: For my part (and as someone who voted against all of the various split proposals when they came before the Assembly earlier this year), I'm still not sure what problem a split is purported to fix. Seems like one of the major concerns in the posts above is inactivity, so what would a split do to encourage greater activity? Are there any examples (maybe from other regions) where a different division of responsibilities has resulted in a more active community? Split was never the main solution to solve inactivity. It is mostly to relieve pressure and to ensure efficiency on all aspects of MoRA. We tend to have one or two RA areas that are strong but the another one is weak for every term. Many regions with the split RA structure (The North Pacific is a prominent example, follow by Europeia back in their heydays) have very active RA. We and TWP are the only feeders where integration and culture is handled under one ministry. That said, a lot of people don't like to bring "uhhh those people do this better/worse than us" into these debates at all.
Chief Supervising Armchair
(07-23-2020, 01:59 AM)Whole India Wrote:(07-22-2020, 05:05 PM)North Prarie Wrote:(07-22-2020, 03:05 AM)Whole India Wrote: 2] Suppression of Freedom to carryout projects The Minister is the democratically elected head of the Ministry. I don’t know why it surprises you that they get to determine the direction of the projects agenda. That’s quite literally what they, not you, were elected to do. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I agree with Whole India, we could have them under MoRA, but have separate ministers, kind of like SoS in MoFA. Or it could be split into Culture, Graphics, and Education.
(08-07-2020, 03:55 PM)Royaltica Wrote: I agree with Whole India, we could have them under MoRA, but have separate ministers, kind of like SoS in MoFA. Or it could be split into Culture, Graphics, and Education. "Ministers" implies that they have the same rank as the MoMA or MoFA. If this is what you mean, it means the dissolution of MoRA, and subjugating it under various different ministries. Plus, if you what you mean is "Deputies," it was already done under Jay's administration. Local Councillor (3/15/20 - 6/23/20)
Deputy Minister of Educational Affairs (2/19/20 - 4/9/20) Senior Fellow of Integration (12/20/20 - 2/19/20) Fellow (1/12/19 - ~10/14/20) Ambassador to Osiris and TWP (4/3/20 - 7/8/20) Legislator (1/19/19 - 11/1/21) Chair of the Assembly (6/23/20 - 9/3/20) Secretary of State (7/8/20 - 2/4/21 | 6/14/21 - 11/1/21) Deputy of Media (2/14/21 - 11/1/21) Ambassador to TNP and Lazarus (6/14/21 - 10/22/21) MoE Leadership (10/14/20 - 11/1/21) |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |