[FAILED] The Commendation/Censure Act |
Section 4, Article 3 of the Legislator Committee Act states that:
Quote:(3) Any member of The South Pacific who is censured may face action by the Chair or the Legcomm, including temporary suspension of legislator status.
It is my opinion that Section 2, Article 1 and Section 2, Article 2 of this bill is unnecessary as Legislators can introduce a commendation/censure bill through Assembly Resolutions, as Roavin has already mentioned. However, it seems to me that Assembly Resolutions are described to be relating to matters of law and bearing the force of law. If I am wrong on the issue of Assembly Resolutions, please tell me. If I am right, I would suggest the use of an other type of legislation that does not have the force of law and is used to express the sentiments of the Assembly, like Concurrent Resolutions of the United States Congress. I suggest that other sections of Article 1 and 2 be kept as they set the definition and scope of commendation and censure and can be used as a referral in times when it is needed. BZERNELEG
South Pacifican. Public Servant. Creator. In that order.
Official Thread • Lampshade Broadcasting Company • The Tsunamy Institution of the Law and Public Policy (10-19-2018, 08:59 PM)Ryccia Wrote: No. Just, no. I am part of the Assembly, and if I don't want to condemn or commend anyone, yet if the Assembly votes for such things, I will be part of a body that may have condemned a person I like, or commended a person I absolutely detest. I'm neither for nor against the act at this point, but I do feel the need to point out that the problem you've hit upon here is nothing more than the double-edged sword of democracy. Anything the Assembly does you could be considered implicitly part of, as a member of that Assembly. Probability states, however, that at least some of those actions will be things you voted against and may even have disagreed strongly with. That's just how democracy works. Founder of the Church of the South Pacific [Forum Thread] [Discord], a safe place to discuss spirituality for people of all faiths and none (currently looking for those interested in prayer and/or "home" groups);
And The Silicon Pens [Discord], a writer's group for the South Pacific and beyond! Yahweo usenneo ir varleo, ihraneo jurlaweo hraseu seu, ir jiweveo arladi. Salma 145:8
Aren't the Legion Awards basically commendations already?
I'm not particularly opposed to censure, to be honest. I think it might be a good idea to have a negative consequence that's not being banned or disenfranchised, for minor infractions. I actually included censure in a new Criminal Code I was working on all the way back in January: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eBFG...sp=sharing
Glen, do you think there are cases where the Assembly should censure somebody for reasons not specified within that proposed Criminal Code?
I mean, I think “behavior unbecoming a legislator” is broad enough to encompass any kind of misbehavior that’s not already listed, that the Assembly finds a big enough deal. If it’s not, then the censure would presumably fail. Unless people are just voting based on whether or not they like the person.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fair enough.
i edited the bill
(10-30-2018, 12:57 AM)islands_of_unity Wrote: i edited the bill You should include a copy of the edited bill and the changes you've made in your post when you do that - it makes it much easier to track progress. Founder of the Church of the South Pacific [Forum Thread] [Discord], a safe place to discuss spirituality for people of all faiths and none (currently looking for those interested in prayer and/or "home" groups);
And The Silicon Pens [Discord], a writer's group for the South Pacific and beyond! Yahweo usenneo ir varleo, ihraneo jurlaweo hraseu seu, ir jiweveo arladi. Salma 145:8
I move to bring this bill to a vote
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |