We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

A Citizen's IRC Channel
#31

Everyone can see the logs. It is obvious who was the one who first started insulting people. It is because of that behaviour that we voted to temporarily ban you from the channel.

I will point out, yet again, that this does not concern the Assemby. I don't know why the Chair of the Assembly is engaging in this kind of debates, when the topic of discussion clearly falls outside his jurisdiction.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
#32

I could not agree more with Kris. This is an asinine conversation that has no place in the Assembly. TSP has no jurisdiction, and the IRC is not property of TSP.
United States of Kalukmangala


Former High Court Justice
#33

Personally all I see is a shouting match between each other. I doubt anyone would go on a "citizens only channel" and lets face it what's the point. We have a RMB in game for everyone.

As I said this just seems to be a shouting match and no one seems to be backing this except Uni. This is not going to pass and all it will do is make more arguments so I would say to scrap this idea now.
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
#34

(09-29-2014, 01:44 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I will point out, yet again, that this does not concern the Assemby. I don't know why the Chair of the Assembly is engaging in this kind of debates, when the topic of discussion clearly falls outside his jurisdiction.

I don't know. I think if the Chair of the Assembly wants to continue to engage in this discussion pulling both himself and the reputation of The South Pacific into the mud, he's perfectly within his elected right to do so.

We need to stop trying to silence free speech and all that jazz.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
#35

(09-29-2014, 04:05 PM)Tsunamy Wrote:
(09-29-2014, 01:44 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I will point out, yet again, that this does not concern the Assemby. I don't know why the Chair of the Assembly is engaging in this kind of debates, when the topic of discussion clearly falls outside his jurisdiction.

I don't know. I think if the Chair of the Assembly wants to continue to engage in this discussion pulling both himself and the reputation of The South Pacific into the mud, he's perfectly within his elected right to do so.

We need to stop trying to silence free speech and all that jazz.

Hardly all he is doing is making a fool of himself. Again I say Uni just scrap this no one else supports this and no one will.
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
#36

Well, I agree. This idea is going nowhere. I withdraw the suggestion.




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .