| SPSF Review - May |
Not exactly the kind of feedback we're looking for, Wolf.
I'm sorry, was I thinking operationally again? How silly of me.
The SPSF needs those passworded areas and masking in order to effectively and security plan its operations. Every other Ministry has either its own special, masked area or a passworded forum. Why does the Ministry of the Army, which relies upon secrecy, confidentiality, and security as much as the CSS, not have what every other Ministry has?
I'm asking what you have been up to and what you plan for the future. You are choosing to be hostile and take a pot-shot at forum administration again, completely unprovoked.
It's been nearly two weeks since you were nominated. Have you thought of any missions? Anybody to work with? Where's your WA right now? Where has it been since Henn nominated you?
Thoughts on missions? Yes.
Things I am willing to share with the entire Assembly of The South Pacific? No. I've been a General for about two days now. Allow me to at least get acclimated to the total lack of forum space and security being provided to the SPSF by the Administration. Why are you sidestepping my questions anyway, Glen? Answer them here or I will start a formal thread in the Operations Center. Either way I want my answers.
*Restraining from making A Few Good Men Reference*
Wolf does make a good point. We've had to keep all of op planning in PM's to eachother at this point, which is just plain inefficient and prevents the rest of the force from getting involved. A password protected forum would really help with operations. Officially being omnipotent via Tapatalk
An eye for an eye just makes the whole world go blind.
~Mahatma Gandhi
Let's not thread-jack and stay on topic. Though Wolf was nominated some time ago, he has only been General for three days. Let's not assume he's got a list of potential operations at the ready simply because you demand it GR.
I do agree with Wolf that the SPSF should have a passworded section on the forum.
(05-04-2015, 08:57 PM)Wolf Wrote: Allow me to at least get acclimated to the total lack of forum space and security being provided to the SPSF by the Administration. Can we please not go down this path? Forum Administration does not have a political agenda. It provides forum space on request from each individual Ministry. There have been no requests from the Ministry of the Army for a secure space, which is the reason why there is no such space. I would appreciate it if we could keep Administration out of politics. We are here to facilitate an enjoyable forum experience, not to be political actors. Thank you, Kris Kringle Forum Administrator Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System (05-04-2015, 09:16 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: It provides forum space on request from each individual Ministry. There have been no requests from the Ministry of the Army for a secure space, which is the reason why there is no such space. Well, in that case, consider this an official request on behalf of the SPSF Generals Corps. 
(05-04-2015, 09:24 PM)Wolf Wrote:(05-04-2015, 09:16 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: It provides forum space on request from each individual Ministry. There have been no requests from the Ministry of the Army for a secure space, which is the reason why there is no such space. Already sent it in, Wolf. Jasper Henn |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
RP-Government Information
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |