^ so this!!

Thank you for asking, Wolf.

I have every intent of dealing with not only current allies that we haven't had the chance to do a mission with, like Europeia or Lazarus, in addition to potential allies, such as Taijitu, and The East Pacific. The SPSF did partake in one mission with the EPSA last Friday, but was a failure.

Most missions with the EPSA and the military of Taijitu occur on these Weekend Updates, as does most liberations, except when the SPSF does its own missions, most of which tend to be raids to balance this out.

I'll answer any further questions.


Jasper Henn

(05-07-2015, 05:28 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Yes, before someone says it, he has been met with hostility by some. But now he is speaking on behalf of the Special Forces, not of himself, and that carries certain responsibility. If the Minister of Foreign Affairs tells him that it would be in the interests of foreign policy to have mutual communication, then it is in the interests of foreign policy to have it, instead of being snarky and turning this whole review into a bad faith argument.

I just asked Glen what he specifically wants from the SPSF in terms of Foreign Affairs. I am not a mind reader.

If he wants to talk about that, he can do so here, openly. If not, find by me, but he's not going to get what he doesn't ask for and "communicate more" isn't actually a measurable goal.

(05-07-2015, 07:22 PM)Wolf Wrote:

(05-07-2015, 05:28 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: Yes, before someone says it, he has been met with hostility by some. But now he is speaking on behalf of the Special Forces, not of himself, and that carries certain responsibility. If the Minister of Foreign Affairs tells him that it would be in the interests of foreign policy to have mutual communication, then it is in the interests of foreign policy to have it, instead of being snarky and turning this whole review into a bad faith argument.

I just asked Glen what he specifically wants from the SPSF in terms of Foreign Affairs. I am not a mind reader.

If he wants to talk about that, he can do so here, openly. If not, find by me, but he's not going to get what he doesn't ask for and "communicate more" isn't actually a measurable goal.

Wolf, can you please stop posting on your own behalf and start thinking you are posting on the SPSF's behalf? It's pissing a lot of people off here, including me.


Jasper Henn

This thread is the most embarrassing thing in TSP.

Well, it all depends on when the Assembly feels the Review is over.


Jasper Henn

On the other hand, we did just capture Atlantic, perhaps the Assembly can review that if they so desire?

OK, I give up.

Nobody here has the slightest willingness to engage in good faith. Some think this is a waste of time and have no intention reviewing the performance of the SPSF. Some thing a recent surge in activity is a sign that everything is alright and won't fully review the overall performance of the SPSF. And Wolf here is only able to be snarky and simply won't engage in an honest discussion, as if nobody had the right to criticise, even after his boss has publicly told him to drop the attitude.

Yes! I am purposefully exaggerating the use of "nobody", since a few of us do want to see a good faith discussion happen. Unfortunately, those people aren't active enough here. That leaves those who think this is a waste of time, who ironically are the ones actually making it a waste of time.

And for the record, no Wold. You don't get to link to one mission and say everything is alright. This review isn't so the SPSF can say it's done missions. It's so the Assembly can help come up with a comprehensive development strategy, and having missions here and there is not comprehensive. If you want to convince the Assembly otherwise, then engage us in good faith, or step out of the way and let your boss do the good job he's been doing throughout this review.

(05-08-2015, 09:11 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote: And for the record, no Wolf. You don't get to link to one mission and say everything is alright.

I never said everything was all right, I simply pointed out that an operation has been performed and that we could discuss its implications.

It's as neutral and as non-offensive of a statement that I could have possibly made.

If you'd like, perhaps we can discuss how this operation could have been improved upon, or how the various Ministries could best communicate about this operation, or what information the Assembly would like to see about this operation? Merely using this one operation as a launching point for discussion, Kris. No need to get all wrapped around the axle.

Goddamn it Wolf, stop. You've pissed me off, with your posting here, and when you piss off the guy who appointed you to your high position, that's either an immense loss or a win depending on your outlook.

Wolf, this is an order, stop posting here unless you are specifically asked a question or you are invited to speak here. Thank you for this Atlantic raid, but you're not helping our case at ALL.


Jasper Henn