Discussion on an International Arms Reduction and Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty |
(05-04-2015, 03:18 PM)Qwert Wrote: According to a recent Sedunnic investigation, this is the current situation regarding nuclear weapons possession in TSP: map 7. If you would like to add Scienta to the map, Scienta can be categorized as "No Current Possession (Rights Reserved)". (05-05-2015, 12:40 AM)Scienta Wrote:(05-04-2015, 03:18 PM)Qwert Wrote: According to a recent Sedunnic investigation, this is the current situation regarding nuclear weapons possession in TSP: map 7. (OOC: Sure!) (04-30-2015, 09:18 PM)JCRules Wrote: Qvait wants to let the VPRB know that it is a preposterous idea that the possible arms reduction and non-nuclear proliferation treaty would violate a nation's sovereignty. First of all, this treaty would not try to prevent one nation from developing a nuclear weapon but rather reduce the nuclear stockpile of all nations. And secondly, this treaty would only affect those who are signatory to it or is voted upon the Southern Cooperation Organisation and/or the Southern Socialist Union. In fact, since your nation doesn't have a nuclear deterrent, this treaty would actually be doing your nation a favor by reducing the stockpile of "competing" nations. A note from the Bruuman Monitor Editorial Staff According to our data, the V.P.R.B. posses sizable stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and has developed or is currently developing nuclear weapons. We consider these assemptions reliable but of course we cannot guarantee any certainty, since the Bruuman government does not disclose any official information on this matter. |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |