or Create an account
  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives South Pacific International Airport Treasure Island Handbook [OOC] Roleplay Convention

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[OOC] Roleplay Convention
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,931,100¢
#31
02-09-2016, 03:56 PM

I'm still hoping to get some input on the proposed reorganisation. In the meantime, what do we think of the Logic Police? The idea behind it was that people could ask realism questions and and anyone with the answer could post there. Should we start a new thread with answers to some basic realism questions and an invitation for anyone to ask other questions?
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • Offline ProfessorHenn
    One Problem at a Time
  • Joined:       Jan 2016
    Posts:       1,032
    Threads:       22
    Rep:       130
    Credits: 0¢
#32
02-09-2016, 04:12 PM

I vote aye!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ProfessorHenn
Legislator
  • Offline Qwert
    [kvɛʈ]
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       12,367
    Threads:       139
    Rep:       1,321
    Credits: 33,680¢
#33
02-09-2016, 04:23 PM

Yes! And the organisation you proposed has my full support.
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator

[+]My roleplay nations
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2016, 04:24 PM by Qwert.)
  • Offline ProfessorHenn
    One Problem at a Time
  • Joined:       Jan 2016
    Posts:       1,032
    Threads:       22
    Rep:       130
    Credits: 0¢
#34
02-09-2016, 04:57 PM

I'd like to ask a question regarding Off-Map Plots, specifically, how we will handle them, how do we consider them, etc. I am implying that we should figure out what might be beyond the edges of the map, so that there are a few more possibilities for us.

I would like to RP as Cyprus off the map, but for this to become a reality, I'd like a consensus on what we think of it. I support islands off-map, nothing else really. I'm an island myself.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ProfessorHenn
Legislator
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,931,100¢
#35
02-09-2016, 05:03 PM

If we decide to expand our plot possibilities, I would want to keep our current format of predefined plots.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • Offline Qwert
    [kvɛʈ]
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       12,367
    Threads:       139
    Rep:       1,321
    Credits: 33,680¢
#36
02-09-2016, 05:08 PM

Obviously not all landmasses are displayed on the map (yes, the polar continent Tounge). I would support allowing for smaller islands off the map, and it would also be nice to have a complete map of the polar continent.
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator

[+]My roleplay nations
  • Offline The Maddest of Jacks
    Junior Member
  • **
  • Joined:       Jun 2014
    Posts:       25
    Threads:       5
    Rep:       3
    Credits: 0¢
#37
02-09-2016, 06:46 PM

(02-09-2016, 03:56 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I'm still hoping to get some input on the proposed reorganisation. In the meantime, what do we think of the Logic Police? The idea behind it was that people could ask realism questions and and anyone with the answer could post there. Should we start a new thread with answers to some basic realism questions and an invitation for anyone to ask other questions?

My only concern with that would be people who have no idea what they're talking about being involved. I'm not familiar enough with your community to name any names, but I've been around RP enough to have seen what happens when people who don't know what they're talking about get into positions where they can influence how people RP and get to decide on what is realistic.

I think you'd have to vet any candidates for this Logic Police carefully, with some kind of disclosure of expertise as part of that.
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,931,100¢
#38
02-09-2016, 07:03 PM

Right now the Logic Police isn't an actual "police". It's more like a thread where anyone can ask questions about realism and nation building, and different people can answer. There is a risk of giving incorrect information, but so far I think we've been rather good at self-moderating in that regard.

Still, it'd be good to have other people's input. Maybe there are some improvements we can have.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • Offline ProfessorHenn
    One Problem at a Time
  • Joined:       Jan 2016
    Posts:       1,032
    Threads:       22
    Rep:       130
    Credits: 0¢
#39
02-09-2016, 07:33 PM

Maybe a set group of 'Logic Police' that can agree or disagree if they're ninja'd.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ProfessorHenn
Legislator
  • Offline rhinotaz
    Tiger Wrangler #1
  • *****
  • Joined:       Jun 2015
    Posts:       10,211
    Threads:       20
    Rep:       21
    Credits: 0¢
#40
02-09-2016, 08:43 PM

Why have a set group? There isn't much wiggle room when arguing realism. If people disagree, let them debate. :/
<33




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives South Pacific International Airport Treasure Island Handbook [OOC] Roleplay Convention


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .