Will it only be one minister holding Embassies Power? If so, please state your reasoning.

Al0neForever, joined 9th January 2020
Regional Fellow
SWAN Knight
Legislator

Reply

They will decide which Cabinet minister(s) among them will be granted Embassies power.

 Unless this was intentional, the current wording makes it sound like only a single minister at a time may have Embassies power.

Will it only be one minister holding Embassies Power? If so, please state your reasoning.

I guess that change is reasonable, but I left out the "s" with the assumption that only MoFA would have that power.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply

A note in regards to the amendment text: there is no need to specify the re-numbering of clauses not relevant to the amendment as Law Standards Act has a provision allowing for the Chair to re-number clauses where appropriate:

Law Standards Act

5. Reformatting of Laws and Legislation

(...)

(3) The Chair of the Assembly may renumber articles, sections, and sub-sections where appropriate.

Reply

Apologies for the double-post but with regards to the RO powers for CRS, I think it may not be wholly illogical to add communication to the three members' powers. In times of strife, it will be useful for the CRS to be able to communicate with the region; i.e. the TEP crisis.

Reply

A note in regards to the amendment text: there is no need to specify the re-numbering of clauses not relevant to the amendment as Law Standards Act has a provision allowing for the Chair to re-number clauses where appropriate:

Law Standards Act

5. Reformatting of Laws and Legislation

(...)

(3) The Chair of the Assembly may renumber articles, sections, and sub-sections where appropriate.

Apologies for the double-post but with regards to the RO powers for CRS, I think it may not be wholly illogical to add communication to the three members' powers. In times of strife, it will be useful for the CRS to be able to communicate with the region; i.e. the TEP crisis.

The draft has been revised accordingly.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply

I do like your use of '(...)' though

I think I'll add it to my list of future law standard amendments haha

Reply

I motion to waive minimum debate time and vote on the four proposed amendments in accordance with Article 1, Section 5 of the Legislative Procedure Act.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply

I second.

Reply

A note on this proposal, I think that people should not vote for this proposal of they want a WA but are apathetic or dislike the idea of a split.

Just because you want a WA ministry would not justify a split.

Aga/Eunopiar

Mostly does boring things.

Reply