[FAILED] Amendments to the Charter and addendum (EA/CA/WA) |
Will it only be one minister holding Embassies Power? If so, please state your reasoning.
Al0neForever, joined 9th January 2020
Regional Fellow SWAN Knight Legislator (01-13-2020, 10:41 PM)Somyrion Wrote:Quote:They will decide which Cabinet minister(s) among them will be granted Embassies power. (01-14-2020, 12:41 AM)Al0neForever Wrote: Will it only be one minister holding Embassies Power? If so, please state your reasoning. I guess that change is reasonable, but I left out the "s" with the assumption that only MoFA would have that power.
A note in regards to the amendment text: there is no need to specify the re-numbering of clauses not relevant to the amendment as Law Standards Act has a provision allowing for the Chair to re-number clauses where appropriate:
Law Standards Act Wrote:
Apologies for the double-post but with regards to the RO powers for CRS, I think it may not be wholly illogical to add communication to the three members' powers. In times of strife, it will be useful for the CRS to be able to communicate with the region; i.e. the TEP crisis.
(01-14-2020, 01:36 AM)Amerion Wrote: A note in regards to the amendment text: there is no need to specify the re-numbering of clauses not relevant to the amendment as Law Standards Act has a provision allowing for the Chair to re-number clauses where appropriate: (01-14-2020, 01:53 AM)Amerion Wrote: Apologies for the double-post but with regards to the RO powers for CRS, I think it may not be wholly illogical to add communication to the three members' powers. In times of strife, it will be useful for the CRS to be able to communicate with the region; i.e. the TEP crisis. The draft has been revised accordingly.
I do like your use of '(...)' though
I think I'll add it to my list of future law standard amendments haha
I motion to waive minimum debate time and vote on the four proposed amendments in accordance with Article 1, Section 5 of the Legislative Procedure Act.
I second.
A note on this proposal, I think that people should not vote for this proposal of they want a WA but are apathetic or dislike the idea of a split.
Just because you want a WA ministry would not justify a split. Aga/Eunopiar
Mostly does boring things. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |