Yes, I looked into his trial before I contributed to the debate on the PB and Indefinite sentencing.

I suggest that you give the "Ban on Indefinite Sentencing" thread a read before you assume Uni is abusing his role as CoA for personal gain Aram.

---

I am a Super Villain

Animefan666 (me): One day I'd like to wipe out humanity...and maybe conquer the city. Ya know, the usual.
Then, once everyone is a zombie, we all starve and Serling dies. A perfect end to a doomed city.
Zombie61: /Rename Animefan666 to The-Brain.
Animefan666: So, now that we've established that I am Brain, who will be my not so brainy sidekick Pinky?

---

Kris: You suddenly remind me of Magneto's White House Speech in Days of Future Past.
TAC: So who's gonna be my right hand mutant?

---

Fortunado: And now i need something to restore my faith in humanity... been a struggle to stop losing it.
LeSageStupide: Have you ever just stared at TAC's avatar for a while? It helps a lot.

Reply

I find it offensive when people imply that the opinion of newer citizens on security is somehow less valuable than that of older citizens. I was there when Milograd couped, and my opinion is as valuable as that of TAC. He has access to enough historical information to make informed decisions.

I wouldn't call it "less valuable", but I would say their information is a "less complete".

I think everyone contributing to this debate are familiar with this topic and reasonably intelligent. However, old threads don't give you ancient IRC conversations, old telegrams, or experience on what fighting a coup truly loos like.

I think TAC has offered some strong insight. I also think first hand experience has a level of value as well.

Reply

But that's what some are implying, HEM. Even if they don't say it outright, the posts of some are basically about how newer people have no business deciding about Milograd and his place in this region, just because they weren't there. I find that unacceptable, because we are all citizens, and that's the only should that should matter.

It is one thing to participate in the debate to provide context, and sincerely try to allow everyone reach the best position possible. It is quite another to say that only those who were present at the time of the coup can make the right calls about the course of the region.

Would I be treated the way TAC and others are being treated, if I made the same arguments about Sedgistan? I certainly hope not, because that is not the South Pacific I know, and that is most certainly not the South Pacific I have served for nearly two years now.

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply