or Create an account
  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives South Pacific International Airport Treasure Island Handbook [DISCUSSION] Organisation of Treasure Island

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[DISCUSSION] Organisation of Treasure Island
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,914,900¢
#31
03-02-2015, 05:23 PM

"Roleplay" can't be in any of the names, that is the only condition. We need to be creative.

Overall I like your ideas!
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • ProfessorHenn
    Guest
  •  
#32
03-02-2015, 06:29 PM

Make Believe Compound!


Ah, the wonders of technology. I'm on Tapatalk!
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,914,900¢
#33
03-02-2015, 06:34 PM

Not Make Believe. I'd rather not copy Spiritus.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • ProfessorHenn
    Guest
  •  
#34
03-02-2015, 07:12 PM

I was copying TWP.

>_>
<_<

Imagination Cape?
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,914,900¢
#35
03-02-2015, 07:17 PM

I will keep Treasure Island.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
  • ProfessorHenn
    Guest
  •  
#36
03-02-2015, 07:49 PM

I mean for the Role-play forum that Qwert wanted to name.
  • Offline Darkstrait
    Nooo they be taking muh purple!
  • *****
  • Joined:       Dec 2014
    Posts:       3,927
    Threads:       40
    Rep:       8
    Credits: 0¢
#37
03-03-2015, 07:40 AM

Midnight Trenches?
Embassy Street?
Conference Room?
I'm just throwing out ideas.
Darkstrait  :ninja:

Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek

"Hats is very fashion this year."

[+]RP Info
  • Offline Punchwood
    Posting Freak
  • *****
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       2,318
    Threads:       141
    Rep:       34
    Credits: 0¢
#38
03-06-2015, 06:32 PM

(02-18-2015, 09:13 PM)Darkstrait Wrote: We need an official committee.
I think that Bantam Harbor should be neatly categorized: SCO, SSU, Wars & Combat, Embassies, News, and Miscellaneous (this would be for stuff like IPSA and other threads that don't really fall into any category above neatly).

(02-23-2015, 01:18 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I have received a request for a SSU subforum. I sympathize with that, but subforums are made based on necessity. For example, the SCO got a subforum because of the large amount of threads it was producing, not because we wanted or needed to give it more prominence.

I agree with Darkstrait on this. I mean you can't tell (unless you can see the future) how many threads the SSU is going to make can you? It's already starting to come back to life. I mean the SCO doesn't really need a subforum because I don't think it should need a separate thread for each accession.

I think the SSU should be allowed a subforum because as it continues to grow it's going to make more and more threads so it too needs a subforum. To go back to my previous point 5 out the 13 threads the SCO has made are accession threads. Every major RP organisation should be treated equally not one being favoured over the other.   
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,914,900¢
#39
03-07-2015, 10:46 PM

We do not create subforums based on what *might* happen. Either the current activity of the SSU merits a separate subforum or it doesn't. That is not discrimination, it is a matter of forum organisation.

There will be no SSU subforum for the time being.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
(This post was last modified: 03-07-2015, 10:46 PM by sandaoguo.)
  • Offline Punchwood
    Posting Freak
  • *****
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       2,318
    Threads:       141
    Rep:       34
    Credits: 0¢
#40
03-08-2015, 02:50 PM

(03-07-2015, 10:46 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: We do not create subforums based on what *might* happen. Either the current activity of the SSU merits a separate subforum or it doesn't. That is not discrimination, it is a matter of forum organisation.

There will be no SSU subforum for the time being.

Your back!!!!! Happywide However I beg to disagree. If you want Bantam Harbour organised then the SSU needs a subforum.  it takes up space it's contents are scattered all over the place. You do create subforum's on what might happen others wise you would not have made a subforum for the SCO. Everything we do is for what might happen that's how world works.  
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice




Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives South Pacific International Airport Treasure Island Handbook [DISCUSSION] Organisation of Treasure Island


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .