| Prohibited Group Discussion: New Pacific Order |
(04-14-2015, 12:56 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(04-14-2015, 12:51 AM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: Where? I've just read that over twice and It didn't say anything like that? (04-14-2015, 12:41 AM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: Does Article 7 actually say that anywhere, or are we assuming because nothing is in there about this type of situation?
An eye for an eye just makes the whole world go blind.
~Mahatma Gandhi
Glen-Rhodes: Milograd and Gaspo's involvement in the coup in 2013, could be connected as a hostile act by the New Pacific Order against The South Pacific.
It seems less absurd of a connection to string, when Milograd is now delegate of Lazarus, doing the same f---king thing he did with The South Pacific backed by none other than the same people who claimed no role in the occupation last time. *rolls his eyes*
(04-14-2015, 12:58 AM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote:(04-14-2015, 12:56 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(04-14-2015, 12:51 AM)FederationOfTheRK Wrote: Where? I've just read that over twice and It didn't say anything like that? He's trying to prove that there is no place in the law where we can remove members who were a part of prohibited groups. Right? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry for the confusion, Federation, I thought it could possibly be applied to former members, I was incorrect.
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
I fully support making the NPO a prohibited group. Their actions are absolutely uncalled for. Given the history with the Milo coup and what is now happening in Laz we should move forward with this.
(04-14-2015, 02:51 AM)Unibot Wrote: Glen-Rhodes: Milograd and Gaspo's involvement in the coup in 2013, could be connected as a hostile act by the New Pacific Order against The South Pacific. That's enough of a link for me. Just want to make sure that if Article 7 is being used, we're at least using it according to how it's written.
Nice approach to guilty by association, and guilty without fair trial TSP... I guess it is clear how fair this can be...
* Elegarth sighs You are just a puppet... You have no soul!
![[Image: HW5PB6l.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/HW5PB6l.jpg)
To Ele's point, I'm not sure we should use any actions are *current* members, but perhaps on future applicants.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
That is not how the law works, tsu. We are not proposing a new course of action, Article 7 already describes in detail what a Prohibited Group designation entails.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I support invoking Article 7 of The Code of Laws against the NPO. What they've done goes against everything we stand for and as open as we are in regards to letting almost anyone in, that makes us the most vulnerable target atm. I wouldn't put it past them to subvert other GCR's to achieve their own ends.
|
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
RP-Government Information
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |