We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Pending War in the South Pacific (Year 2030)
#31

How about territorial annexation?
"毎日の小さな努力の積み重ねが歴史を作っていくんだよ。"



Put a little effort everyday and it will stack up and create a foundation for you.


- Doraemon


[Image: 5bDBXB8.png] [Image: Gny2SfF.png] [Image: tUG5vUH.png]

Treasure Island Awards Best Roleplay 2020
Treasure Island Awards Best Roleplayer 2020
Cocos Winner for Best Character Writer 2017
Cocos Winner for Best International Event 2017
Cocos Winner for Best Overall RP 2017

Things to know: Medical Intern and Biomedical Scientist from Indonesia, Muslim, 188 metres tall, loves trains
Reply
#32

I would join if there's a level of realism and detail. Some suggestions:

Cause(s) for the war: It begins as a peacekeeping operation in a collapsing nation involving a few nations with different interests and goals. The nations don't agree, which leads to provocations and ultimately open conflict that escalates.

People and countries involved: Nations involved in peacekeeping operations in the collapsing nation.

Alliances during the war: Two main alliances with opposing goals. We probably need to come up with new.

What happens during the war: Escalation and failing diplomacy, open hostilities and operations aiming to secure strategic territory before the opponent to gain the upper hand before an all out war.

How the war ends: It would be interesting if a total war never breaks out. One side wins (can go through with their plans without hindrance) because it manages to secure most of these strategic spots, rendering the other side severely locked in, risking heavy losses.
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator


Reply
#33

No interest. Leave me out.
Reply
#34

Cautious about this, but listening.
An eye for an eye just makes the whole world go blind.
~Mahatma Gandhi


Reply
#35

Interested, since its not canon.
I am Zadiner/Zak. Part of Assembly, some other stuff, Founder of some other region.
Hey, I have a bunch of issues. You don't need to care.
Emoji of the week:  :dodgy:
Reply
#36

(10-11-2015, 01:17 AM)RandomGuy199 Wrote: That would be the third one. However, the Modern Warfare series (which takes place from 2011-2016) is exactly that; modern tech, as in present-day tech. All the things shown in those games already exist and are used by RL armies today. I would propose something more like Black Ops 2, with drones, cybernetic warfare, etc.

Black Ops II is good, but I was thinking kind of Battlefield 4 (2020), where technology has only advanced a little compared to 2015.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
Reply
#37

The problem with basing our tech off of a game is that everyone needs to have it and have played it thoroughly, or otherwise research it heavily.
Reply
#38

...Or just watched a short gameplay video or opened a wiki page.



<33
Reply
#39

(10-12-2015, 05:35 PM)rhinotaz Wrote: ...Or just watched a short gameplay video or opened a wiki page.

Yeah, I don't have Battlefield 4, so I went to the Battlefield Wikia and watched YouTube videos of Battlefield 4. The point I'm trying to make is that we will use weapons and technology that have only advanced a little.
4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History
Reply
#40

What was futuristic about BF4?
Roleplayer
Manager of the TSP and A1-0 maps
Roleplay moderator


Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .